

But panolapse seems to have a bug, a fully 360° pan thru a panorama is not possible, because after 300° or so the movement begins to run backwards :-(. You need lots of photos, 30, 40 or 50 is a complete waste of time. With panolapse you can pan through a panroma and the result can be exported to a video file.A poorly framed photo will not make a good timelapse.

It was a disaster, for the following reasons: Three weeks ago when my daughter was out punting with pathfinders (youth group from church) I decided to bite the bullet and give it a go. I'm notoriously impatient when it comes to photography and the idea of taking hundreds of photos to do a load of post processing on and convert into a video dampened my enthusiasm somewhat. Naime, Panolapse omoguuje da irokokutne timelapse snimke budu animirane kao kada se koristi pomina video glava, poput SkyWatcherove AllView montae. Having read the instructions I did a few test shots then put it back in my computer cupboard to gather dust along with the cameras. Pojavio se odlian novi softver za timelapse snimke Panolapse 360 biti e od koristi i astrofotografima. A few weeks later to my surprise my mother-in-law had bought it for me and it arrived in the post. I often add stuff to my wish list I find interesting or for reference (I have since created a private wish for such things now). Just over a year ago I saw a cheap intervoltmeter on Amazon compatible with the 400d and added it to my wish list.

It's a good little camera a bit fiddly to use and the viewfinder is positively tunnel like. The 400d has been used less than a dozen times and I should have really sold it on Ebay, but it's hardly worth it. Collecting dust on a shelf I've got a 5d and a 400d both of which are about 7 years old now. I've been meaning to have a go at timelapse photography for some time, but not willing to sacrifice my 5d mk2 to so many shutter actuations.
